Kidneys a Commodity?

Earlier this week, I caught this interesting article below in Newsweek addressing a law professor’s argument for legalizing the sale of kidneys in the U.S. as a solution to helping decrease the number of people waiting for transplants. I can only imagine the issues that would arise from putting a system like this into place and Cohen makes some weak ethical comparisons to justify such a drastic change.

It’s not to say that there isn’t a better solution out there or that a better system won’t be put in place down the line. Nonetheless, for the time being, I think there is still a great deal of potential for increasing the “nudge factor” via combined online outreach, social networking, etc. to both educate the public on the issue and ultimately increase the number of donor registrations on a grand scale.

Take a look below and drop a comment, I’m curious to hear your thoughts.

-Scott

Article Link: http://www.newsweek.com/id/137544

Are Kidneys a Commodity?

Lloyd Cohen thinks people should have the right to buy or sell organs, and idea reviled by docs.
Jerry Adler
NEWSWEEK
Updated: 2:23 PM ET May 17, 2008

As of last Wednesday at 5:44 p.m., according to the minute-by-minute count on the Web site of the United Network for Organ Sharing, there were 75,629 people awaiting kidney transplants in the United States. Here’s roughly what we can expect to happen over the next 12 months, based on the experience of recent years. About 10,000 of them will receive transplants from deceased strangers, awarded by UNOS roughly in order of waiting time. An additional 6,000 or so on the waiting list will get a transplant from a living donor, almost invariably a close friend or relative. About 5,000 will either die or become too sick to qualify for a transplant. Most of the rest will still be waiting a year from now. They might want to consider talking to Lloyd Cohen.

Cohen is a professor of law at George Mason University who for two decades has been fighting for the right to sell off his major organs—or to buy one from someone else, should he need it. These are practices currently prohibited by U.S. law, and widely reviled by doctors, who like to believe they occupy one of the last bastions of selfless altruism in the American economy. Last week Cohen took his case to Intelligence Squared U.S. (IQ2), the Oxford-style debating society with a fondness for provocative libertarian issues, such as legalizing a market for human organs. Cohen has made his case at length in articles and books, but he can summarize it in a dozen words: “If you pay people for something, they will provide more of it.” This, he says, is as true of body parts as anything else.

How far is Cohen willing to push this argument? Well, he’s publicized a codicil to his will that forbids his survivors from donating his organs for transplant, except to relatives, or if some third party, such as an insurance company, pays for them. At a minimum, he’d like to legalize such arrangements, so anyone could contract to sell his or her organs after death for the benefit of survivors. In an ideal world—well, I’m not sure where he’d draw the line. He believes healthy people should be allowed to sell a kidney at whatever price the market will bear. But I lost my nerve before asking if he thinks they should be allowed to sell two.

Give Cohen credit; he’s thought through the unsettling implications of this idea in 21st-century America: the Internet auctions, the reality-TV shows (“American Kidney”? “Survivor: Dialysis”?), legal battles over custody of a kid on life support. That’s the price society would have to pay for the goal of getting more kidneys into people. As for the ethical objection that poor people shouldn’t be tempted into selling spare body parts for cash, running a small but measurable risk to their health, he suggests a comparison with other valued commodities that are dangerous to obtain, like tuna fish. People risk their lives on fishing boats because they’re paid for it. By the same token, says Sally Satel, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who debated on Cohen’s team at the IQ2 U.S. event, “we don’t think firemen are any less heroic because they are paid to save us.”

Satel knows what she’s talking about: in 2004 she was diagnosed with kidney failure. Most likely she’d still be waiting on dialysis, but for a friend, Virginia Postrel, who in 2006 volunteered one of her kidneys for transplant. Clearly, Satel would have been willing to pay whatever sum might have induced a stranger to do the same. In a free market she would have been one of the winners, by the luck of being relatively affluent. But there’s just as much luck involved in having friends like Postrel. Nothing in life is entirely fair, and a billionaire in need of a kidney is a poor man if he can’t buy one at any price. And, in case someone like that is wondering, Cohen’s kidneys aren’t for sale, even if the law changes. At least while he’s alive. He is 61, is in excellent health and doesn’t need the money.

Advertisements

2 Responses to Kidneys a Commodity?

  1. BreathinSteven says:

    There are moments when I see the logic in his thought – but I also believe that the current laws have been well thought out. Under current laws, compensation is not permitted for a deceased or living organ. Various costs can be covered: transportation, loss of wages, healthcare costs… But an organ cannot be “sold”. I believe that allowing people to sell organs, living or deceased, pushes us onto a slippery slope.

    His argument that “if you pay people for something, they will provide more of it” may have merit, but I also believe that this situation is a little too ripe for corruption and misuse. Stories abound in “transplant tourism” locations of people being taken advantage of – recipients having some inept idea that their “volunteer” living donor is receiving thousands of dollars, possibly a year’s income, when they are really receiving the equivalent of a few hundred dollars, if that, and are forced into this situation to put food on their table, or provide care for a loved one. With the drastic increase in families living below the poverty level in the United States – how many steps away can that be if we allow that to happen here?

    I would like to believe that we would not become like China or India or other countries that turn a blind-eye on organ selling – but I believe that it would be the nature of the beast to take advantage of the already-less-advantaged…

    This goes beyond altruism – or the belief that altruism is failing. I think this brings to question a sense of fairness. The wealthy, including Mr. Cohen (as mentioned in the story), have little need to sell their organs – the less wealthy, who could have a financial need to sell their organs, would probably not have the financial ability to buy an organ should they or a loved one require an organ to survive.

    Healthcare is already in a bad place in the United States – to an extent; healthcare is available to those who can afford it. This would likely mirror that situation, and even exaggerate it. Organs would go to those who can afford them, and ultimately they might simply go to the highest bidder. And they would come from those who cannot afford them.

    The story ends with “nothing in life is entirely fair, and a billionaire in need of a kidney is a poor man if he can’t buy one at any price.” And what Mr. Cohen and Ms. Satel are effectively saying is that a billionaire is more worthy of life than a poor man… Sadly, there are enough people who agree with them…

    I can only hope that Mr. Cohen’s wife or daughter or someone he loves – should they need a heart, lungs or liver – are not impacted by a potential donor as selfish as Mr. Cohen is.

    Sincerely,

    Steve Ferkau
    Chicago, IL

  2. -Scott (Campaign Manager) says:

    Thanks Steve, excellent insight.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: